Does the Obama administration want to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon or prevent its ally Israel from destroying Iran’s nuclear capability?
Sadly, concludes the Wall Street Journal, this president seems to car more about preventing an Israeli attack than a nuclear Iran.
I’ve defended Obama on some of his social policies, and against the libel that he wasn’t born in the United States. Personally I think that a lot of reactionary-authoritarian criticism of Obama is wrongheaded and closed-minded, and that there are definitely people who hate having a “black man in the white house” as it were. But this is where I draw the line.
I said it a thousand times already! We MUST bomb Iran before this threat to the civilized world and all of humanity takes over the world like Hitler once almost did! Iran’s evil anti-semitic president has attempted to cast doubt on the Holocaust by implicating that people are thrown in prison in Europe for questioning it. THE HATRED OF THIS VILE EVIL THREAT TO ISRAEL MUST BE STOPPED BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE!
Obama’s reluctance to do anything about the islamofascist mullahs in Iran is not only offensive, it’s dangerous. It’s a well known fact that it is Israel who wants to whipe Israel off the map, not the other way around. It’s also a well known fact that they are developing nuclear weapons for that very purpose. Yet, Obama refuses to deal with Iran’s iniquitous, duplicitous equivocations.
We must go to war with Iran and frankly I don’t care if it takes us another 50 years. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time. Iran claims that it has a close-to-perfect existence that’s the envy of the dastardly lowlifes around it. While nothing could be further from the truth. Iran doesn’t allow women to vote, while women in Israel are in the highest positions of government and science. Iran hangs people for stealing loaves of bread or public displays of affection, while Israel is an open society. And last but not least, Iran is not a democracy, while Israel is. If we fail in our task of leading the way to the future, not to the past, then it will put the public peace perpetually in danger. In particular, if Iran wants to complain, it should have an argument. It shouldn’t just throw out crap about “non-interference”. Usually those who don’t want others looking in on them have something to hide. An armed attack against Iran is morally justified and no options including nuclear strikes against civilians should be taken off the table.
Should we sit back and let Iran conspire with evil, or should we shed a little light on some of the ignorant prejudices that reside within the pea-sized brains of mysogynistic, homophobic, theocratic bigots? That choice sure sounds like a no-brainer to me. Iran’s philosophies are perpetuated by hate, the demand that one strive permanently and painfully for something that not only does not exist but is alien to the human condition.
We must destroy bigotry before it destroys us. Failure to do so would be a throwback to the stone age, where women can be raped in the streets, and where African-Americans would oscillate from every tree and lamp-post in America, and where the noble people of the Jewish faith would be murdered in the gagging gas-chambers and then burnt alive in ovens.
Anybody who denies the necessity of going to war with Iran should have his loyalty to America questioned. Yes a war with Iran would benefit Israel but real Americans defend Israel, unconditionally.